You are currently viewing the archived version of Portland Hikers. To view the new version go to http://www.portlandhikers.org.

Welcome to Sign in | Join | Help
in
Home Field Guide Forums New Posts My Gallery Photos Maps Find a Hike! Links

Olympus SP-55OUZ Review

Last post 05-09-2008, 12:37 PM by Waffle Stomper. 18 replies.
Page 1 of 2 (19 items)   1 2 Next >
Sort Posts: Previous
  • Olympus SP-55OUZ Review

     02-06-2008, 11:22 PM

    Since buying my first DSLR several years ago, I noticed that I had gotten out of the habit of taking spontaneous photos on hikes. Before my series of DSLRs, I had carried a "pro-sumer" Olympus C-730 10x zoom, and it was easy to pull out and snap photos with, as well as use with manual settings for timed exposures and more careful landscape shots. I had tried carrying a Canon S-400 "Digital Elph" with my DSLRs, but was disappointed with the limitations of the camera, despite the convenience of easily fitting into a pocket.

    So I recently upgraded to a new "pro-sumer" camera to fill this niche, and also bring image stabilization, more zoom and larger image files than my old C-730 could deliver. I settled on the Olympus SP-55OUZ, largely because I really like Olympus optics and quality, their long tradition of highly compact designs, and also because it has an outrageous 18x zoom! More on that in a moment.

    The 55OUZ is feather light, even with the four AA batteries loaded. So it fits neatly in a belt pouch, and thus is easy to pull out and use on the trail (as opposed to the cumbersome SLR in my backpack). So yes, I will be carrying two cameras from now on, plus that damned tripod! This will help me photograph all those trail signs for the Field Guide! ;-)

    Specs: it is a 7.1 megapixel camera with auto and manual focus and exposure features, so fully capable of being mounted on a tripod in lieu of a DSLR, if you are so inclined. The focus is through a digital viewfinder or on an easy-to-read 2.5" LCD monitor. It is also equipped with sensor-shift and digital image stabilization, which makes the very long zoom not only possible, but actually quite amazing.

    It also has an ISO range of 50 to 5000 - and that low end is very handy for long exposures, since the big handicap of the very long lens is not being able to really mount filters on this camera. Unlike my earlier Olympus "pro-sumer", the tube accessory for this camera begins to vignette at wide angle settings, so it useless as a full-time lens protector and filter mount. So I'm having to get used to running around with the lens (gasp!) exposed to the world. In other words, like pretty much everyone else does without giving it a second thought..! :-)

    There are lots of features, including video with sound and a number of assist and help modes for new photographers. But the bottom line is image quality, of course. So here's a demo that I shot the other day in the Columbia Gorge to show what the camera delivered on a fairly contrasty, colorless day. The first image shows the camera at its widest lens setting, hand-held at approximately 28mm in traditional lens terms:




    A generally nice result, with a good balance between highlight and shadow details, given the dubious conditions. Look closely, and you see a box labeled "Image 2" that shows the extent of the next photo, shot at approximately 12x, hand-held with stabilizers on:




    As you can see, the results are very nice, despite wavering hands and cold fingers! This would be an amazing amount of zoom on most compact cameras, but as you can see by the area labeled as "Image 3", the zoom is capable of much more. This last image is captured at 18x, or the conventional lens equivalent of 500mm (!), hand-held with image stabilizers on:




    This is the real knockout, as you can see. Excellent detail, and an excellent exposure in a contrasty situation, In fact, the most difficult part was hand-holding the camera to capture the right scene. At this magnification, a tripod isn't needed to keep focus if the stabilizers are on, but it would help in framing the image! Truly amazing technology!

    Technical note: for these images, I used sharpening to roughly approximate the degree of focus and sharpness evident in the original images. No other Photoshop adjustments, though.

    This would be a fine camera for any hiker. The only caution I would note is that it needs a small bag for protection, since the giant lens has a slip-on cap, as opposed to a self-containing clam shell set-up. The cap could easily slip off when hiking, so you'd want to protect the camera from that possibility. I paid about $330 for the camera and xD media card.

    Tom

  • Re: Olympus SP-55OUZ Review

     02-08-2008, 5:37 PM

    what i dont get is why you dont just get a smaller camera for one to take along with the slr in your pack.
    jamey pyles
  • Re: Olympus SP-55OUZ Review

     02-11-2008, 11:12 AM

    Thanks Tom for the camera review.

    I recently purchased the Olympus sp-510uz, which is simular to the 550, but has a shorter zoom, and have also been pleased with the image quality. I would add though, to anyone considering this camera, that an Olympus xD media card is necessary to use the panorama, 3D, and art features of the camera.

  • Re: Olympus SP-55OUZ Review

     02-11-2008, 5:26 PM

    Thanks - that's a good point. The other thing about the xD media is that it's so tiny as to be a pain to work with (with cold fingers, for example). My solution is to buy a large enough media card to never have to take it out. I bought a 2 GB card, which allows for a few hundred images, and therefore no need to switch cards on a hike.

    Jamey, I don't understand your question..!

    Tom
  • Re: Olympus SP-55OUZ Review

     02-11-2008, 5:48 PM

    i was joking kind of,.... what i mean was,  you could have goten just as much megapixels and features with some smaller point and shoot cameras,  so it didnt exactly make sense why you would need another bigger sized camera (compared to some at least).

    jamey pyles
  • Re: Olympus SP-55OUZ Review

     04-07-2008, 9:34 AM

    • Joined on 08-01-2006
    • Willamette Valley
    • Posts 190
    • Top 50 Contributor
      Male

    Hi Tom,

    That zoom is UNBELIEVABLE!!!! Very, very impressive.

     

     


    Greg Lief
    LiefPhotos.com
    OregonWildflowers.org
  • Re: Olympus SP-55OUZ Review

     04-07-2008, 11:13 AM

    • Joined on 06-03-2006
    • Hillsboro, OR
    • Posts 759
    • Top 25 Contributor
      Male
    Here's the dpreview March 07 review:
    http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/olympussp550uz/

    Always trade-offs with any camera it seems, even with dSLRs.
  • Re: Olympus SP-55OUZ Review

     04-07-2008, 3:55 PM

    Thanks, Fettster - that was one of the reviews I looked at, too. In the end, I was looking for "Swiss army knife" camera that had every conceivable feature in a compact, light package. Since it's not my main camera for quality photos, I was okay with it not being the top of the line in image sharpness -- especially given the tradeoff of range. The telephoto is obviously very cool for hikers, but the true wide angle is also very nice, as the reviewer notes.

    Having used it for a few weeks, I only have a couple of complaints:

    1. The power on/off button is easily triggered when putting the camera away. It's not a huge deal, because the camera is designed to pop the lens cap off and the zoom mechanism automatically stops extending when it finds resistance (... resistance is NOT futile to this camera!). But it means that your lens cap might be floating around the camera bag in the process. So you have to be careful when putting it away.

    2. The manual focus is a bit cumbersome to learn - as as the dpreview points out, the sheer number of features makes it a bit daunting to learn where to find things. I'm getting there, but this is not a camera for beginners who really just want a point and shoot.

    Greg, I was of similar mind in buying a camera with a decent video capability, but I haven't used it for that purpose... yet. Still trying to figure out still photography on this thing!

    Tom
  • Re: Olympus SP-55OUZ Review

     04-12-2008, 3:16 PM

    Thank you so much for a detailed review supported with photos.  I found this link due to my google search for the Olympus SP-550UZ.   I couldn't pass up the deal at Wal-Mart today.  $194   With only one left...I bought it and would do the research later.

    I am not a hiker but I travel alot solo and find my roadtrips taking me places where I wished I had a camera with features for zoom and detail (the Rocky Mts, Zion and Bryce Nat'l parks, Badlands, Death Valley, Smokey Mts, etc.)  I just always had a little Olympus digital pocket camera laying on the seat beside me.  Great color...but I was wanting more zoom.

    Your post has made me feel like I made a wise choice.  Now...I just need to head out in search of some great scenery to test it out.  Thanks again!

    ~Souette in Tennessee

  • Re: Olympus SP-55OUZ Review

     04-12-2008, 4:31 PM

    Wow - great price! You can't go wrong for that. Glad the review helped, and my only caution is to protect that lens -- makes me nervous not to have a protective filter over a lens, but that's a tradeoff for the massive zoom that this camera has. I just carry a lens cloth, and make sure I'm tending to it whenever I put the lens cap back on.

    Tom
  • Re: Olympus SP-55OUZ Review

     04-12-2008, 7:23 PM

    • Joined on 07-11-2007
    • Lake Oswego, Oregon
    • Posts 202
    • Top 50 Contributor
      Female

    Thanks for the review. What attracts me to it in addition to the swiss-army reference is the fact that it uses AA batteries. Some day I hope to have some grand once in a lifettime adventure where I might be in some exotic location where I won't have easy access to plug in my chargers and and would like something like this as a backup camera just in case I run out those heavy/expensive rechargeable batteries.


    “We must go beyond textbooks, go out into the bypaths and untrodden depths of the wilderness and travel and explore and tell the world the glories of our journey.”
    ~John Hope Franklin
  • Re: Olympus SP-55OUZ Review

     04-26-2008, 11:20 PM

    • Joined on 07-11-2007
    • Lake Oswego, Oregon
    • Posts 202
    • Top 50 Contributor
      Female
    I thought I would seek images shot with this camera by doing a search on flickr. That is a great camera for sure.
    “We must go beyond textbooks, go out into the bypaths and untrodden depths of the wilderness and travel and explore and tell the world the glories of our journey.”
    ~John Hope Franklin
  • Re: Olympus SP-55OUZ Review

     05-06-2008, 10:54 PM

    • Joined on 07-11-2007
    • Lake Oswego, Oregon
    • Posts 202
    • Top 50 Contributor
      Female

    I could not resist. My trusty ol' canon S-40 is not compatable with vista. @!%#$@. Well okay, I could get a card reader, but no, I decided to upgrade and I took the review of the 550 to heart. It was a tough decision so I opted for the 570. I'm sure the 550 is close. I just had to have the extra megapixels. Just can't get enough.

    After my first few pics, it does fall short of a dSLR. But for a camera with versatility it fits my needs. My complaint so far is that it needs a broader range of aperture settings. I have not had a chance to really run it through its paces but here is a picture I took with the super macro function. The time of day was 4:30 5/06. Overcast on an east facing wall. I'm impressed as this was hand held  and a couple inches from this little bug. I had it set on "program" Sure it's a bit out of focus but given the conditions it passed the test.

    If there is a negative, the camera itself is not as user friendly as I would like it to be. But it could be that I am so conditioned to my canon cameras that I have not quite made the adjustment.


    “We must go beyond textbooks, go out into the bypaths and untrodden depths of the wilderness and travel and explore and tell the world the glories of our journey.”
    ~John Hope Franklin
  • Re: Olympus SP-55OUZ Review

     05-08-2008, 1:52 PM

        Waffle, you will get used to it, I have owned canon, fiji, and olympus compacts, as well as nikon and sony SLRs, they all take a bit getting used to.  The olypus approach has some better things, and some worse things than the canon as you will discover.  Personally canon still has my favorite overall interface.

    You will be limited to large apertures on a compact like that, they just can't stop down because the lens is tiny to begin with.  Plus, light sensitivity in compacts is a problem, so you can actually be reather glad it won't let you go to f/16, you'd be looking at 5 second exposures on overcast days!

    Nice macro shot, it's quite god, the DOF ain't bad either!

    Andy
  • Re: Olympus SP-55OUZ Review

     05-08-2008, 9:21 PM

    • Joined on 07-11-2007
    • Lake Oswego, Oregon
    • Posts 202
    • Top 50 Contributor
      Female

    I agree that there are pros and cons. I appreciate the little box that comes up for fine focusing. I am so used to using the viewfinder with all my cameras that has taken some adjusting to. It is better than an old PowerShot Pro1 that I had. It was really choppy when following moving animals or moving the camera to compose my picture. This is much better.

    Like you I am partial to my Canon cameras but this does beat lugging assorted lenses with me. So when I'm with my friends who just want to hike this is the camera. I'll save the other for like minded photo/hikers.


    “We must go beyond textbooks, go out into the bypaths and untrodden depths of the wilderness and travel and explore and tell the world the glories of our journey.”
    ~John Hope Franklin
Page 1 of 2 (19 items)   1 2 Next >
View as RSS news feed in XML
Powered by Community Server, by Telligent Systems